Del Rosario Pandiphil Inc.
Shipping and the Law
Court reduces disability grading; upholds POEA contract provisions
Seafarer fell during a lifeboat drill accident causing pain on his chest and back and swelling on his left clavicle bone. He was eventually declared unfit for sea duties as he was diagnosed to suffer cervical disc disease level of C3 C4 C5 C6 with Radiculopathy. The company physician gave him a disability Grade 10 (US$12,090). Dissatisfied, seafarer filed a complaint before the Labor Arbiter for full disability benefits of Grade 1 (US$60,000). The parties agreed to seek the opinion of another doctor who likewise gave a disability grading of Grade 10.
The Labor Arbiter awarded US$60,000 as Grade 1 disability benefits as complainant could no longer go back to his previous work. On appeal, the NLRC affirmed the Labor Arbiter as complainant’s injury being for life is analogous to the grade 1 injuries in the POEA Schedule of Disability.
The Court of Appeals reversed the ruling of the NLRC and awarded Grade 10 (US$12,090) disability benefits.
The Court ruled:
1. The seafarer deserves to be compensated
for his injury. However, the POEA
contract is clear t
2. The Labor Arbiter and the NLRC do not have specialized knowledge in the medical field. The company physician has such specialized knowledge and treated seafarer from the very beginning. Their findings of Grade 10 therefore has basis.
3. The contract is still the law between the parties. In this case, the seafarer is claiming under the POEA contract and thus the terms thereof must be respected.
In the words of Justice Amelita Tolentino:
“Indeed, the law takes precedence over the contract of the parties. Laws are deemed written into the terms of the contract. However, the contract is still the law between the parties. Especially in this case where the party is claiming under the contract, the terms thereof must at least be respected. If the same will not be applied, it must be for the same reason. To our mind, it is certainly a grave abuse of discretion on the part of the public respondent (NLRC) when it replaced the findings of the company-designated physician with its own finding and totally disregarded the basic provisions of the POEA contract without any justification for doing so. Since the contract is the law between the parties, we cannot ignore the provisions therein without stating any valid reason therefore.”
Career Philippines Shipmanagement, Inc. et.al. vs. NLRC, et.al., CA-G.R. SP No. 79150, April 27, 2005 (Justice Amelita Tolentino, Special Ninth Division, Court of Appeals)
Note: Attys. Herbert Tria and Dennis Acaban of Del Rosario & Del Rosario handled case for vessel interests.
T. Del Rosario is managing partner of Del Rosario & Del Rosario. He
is former president of the Maritime Law Association of the
For complete copy of the decision or for further information, please call 63 2 810 1791 or fax 63 2 817 1740 or email firstname.lastname@example.org
article is sent from time to time to clients and friends. To unsubscribe,
reply to this email and put "unsubscribe"
in the subject.
This publication is only intended to summarize general points of interest in the material discussed herein. It is not intended to be exhaustive, accurate or to be legal advice with respect to the matters discussed.
Del Rosario & Del Rosario
Del Rosario Pandiphil Inc.
Tel. 63 2 810 1791 Fax 63 2 817 1740
24/7 mobile 63 917 830 8384
***Internet Email Confidentiality Footer***
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and all attached and/or related communications are strictly CONFIDENTIAL and may contain copyright and/or legally privileged information. They are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. No one else may read, print, store, copy, forward, distribute or otherwise take any action in reliance thereon. The use of e-mail for any unlawful purpose or for any purpose other than as permitted, allowed and/or intended by the above entities is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication by mistake, please notify us immediately, delete the message from your system, and destroy any hard copies. Any unauthorized access to, review, reproduction, dissemination, di
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of the above entities.
Please be cautioned t